Zimmer knee lawsuit

An independent medical body was about to release its findings this week of an FDA-commissioned study of the effectiveness of the pre-market approval method for artificial joints. At the exact same time, a lobbying group with a pro-orthopedic industry agenda is attempting to impugn the report’s recommendations just before they are even released.
Many Zimmer Knee lawsuits contribute to FDA action.

Specialists predict that the study, conducted by the highly regarded Institute of Medicine, will advocate stricter regulations for the approval of new implant devices. An skilled Zimmer knee lawyer really should be aware of the FDA’s “fast track” 510(k) medical device clearance procedure. For example, Zimmer’s NexGen CR Flex artificial knee device, a device facing allegations of early knee failure and knee revision surgery in a typical Zimmer knee lawsuit, was given market place clearance under the 510(k) standard 2005.

Unlike the FDA’s option, much more rigorous pathway to marketplace approval, the 510(k) clearance process does not call for a device to undergo clinical tests, such as a pre-marketplace Zimmer knee study. Rather, the device makers require only show that the artificial implant is “substantially equivalent” to devices currently on the market place.

Mixed reaction to FDA’s investigation

A pro-organization group attacking the upcoming 510(k) study claims that the review board appointed by the esteemed Institute of Medicine to oversee the report is unacceptably biased. Despite the reality that the 12-member assessment board is not only composed of physicians and academics, but also lawyers who have worked in the past for device makers and consumer advocates alike, the protesting organization believes that the absence of representatives from the producers themselves, or their satisfied implant customers, should automatically invalidate the study’s conclusions.

Artificial joint makers have further protested that stricter industry approval recommendations will have a negative impact on the well being of patients, given that innovative products will take longer to get to the market.

Not absolutely everyone in the medical community agrees with attacks on the forthcoming report, nevertheless. The NY Occasions lately quoted a Yale medical professor expressing his displeasure with the device industry’s techniques: “We are attempting to get to great policies, and the spin game doesn’t assist us.”

Zimmer knee lawyer in favor of FDA action

Like other advocates for patients harmed by related medical devices, a Zimmer knee lawyer may allege that the 510(k) process is inadequate. Medical devices cleared to industry in this fashion expose patients to all sorts of dangers as evidenced by numerous recalls and mounting lawsuits.

A Zimmer knee lawyer may possibly agree that had the FDA conducted pre-market trials to study implants such as the NexGenCR-Flex and similar devices from other device producers, patients and doctors could make much more informed choices about the devices chosen.

Find out how you can file a Zimmer Knee lawsuit