Designer Jewelry Brands – Diamonds Now and Then Aren’t For Ever

Cute Jewellery In News Reports Once more

Designer jewelry brands very often feature diamonds as being the jewel on the crown of cute jewellery. Dirty tricks and crimes that involve these sparkly rocks have of late been hitting the news headlines in a spate of world-wide stories. Nevertheless these major criminal cases haven’t concerned designer jewelry brands.

As an example, away from the designer jewelry brands market, recently the previous wife of the Sultan of Brunei won a multi-million dollar case in England against her ex – female security guard. Mariam Aziz, who was wedded to the sultan in between 1981 and 2003, filed two claims in the uk against Fatimah Kumin Lim for stealing of her cute jewellery.

The judge, Mr Justice Lindblom, sitting at the High Court in London, decided Ms Lim had sold on a diamond bracelet and two diamonds, together worth somewhere around $20m (?12.5m), without consent.

Ms Aziz is already trying to get damages from Ms Lim, who resides in Singapore. The judge explained he found in favour of Ms Aziz but that an assessment needs to be made to figure out how much should really be given in damages.

The diamond bracelet was thought to be worth about $5.5m while a blue pear-shaped diamond was valued by Ms Aziz at $12.7m. A rectangular yellowish diamond is considered to have a minimum valuation of $1m. Ms Aziz had informed the court she had given a diamond bracelet to one of her bodyguards for safekeeping during an evening out in 2008, and had not seen it again. This really is the kind of loss you would probably certainly notice. And, in contrast to many designer jewelry brands, this piece was distinctive and could not be replaced.

Her past bodyguard said she had been asked to sell the jewels on to repay her boss’s gaming financial obligations. Nonetheless Ms Aziz’s legal professionals told the court that Ms Lim had set up the sale of the bracelet to a Geneva-based company for more than $5m, mainly because it was she who had gaming debts. The judge agreed with the explanation in court that it was “bordering on the absurd” to suggest that Mrs Aziz, an immensely rich woman, might need to sell the diamonds to meet the claimed ?820,000 debt. Ms Lim, who’s living in Singapore and hadn’t been in the court in London, has been made the subject of a worldwide order freezing her properties and assets.

In the meantime, another case concerning diamonds hit the news around the world. Charles Taylor, the deposed president of Liberia, heard a judge in an international court declare him accountable for 11 counts of war crimes, including “acts of terrorism” and “sexual slavery”. Taylor was accused by United Nations prosecutors of trading in “blood diamonds” to fund a ferocious and bloody conflict conducted by rebels in Liberia’s neighbouring Sierra Leone.

The conviction has created global history. The ex-president who ruled Liberia in between 1997 and 2003 became the first ex-head of state to be convicted by international justice since the Nuremburg trials 65 years back. A prosecutor stated the verdict established that presidents could be “held to account” for their actions in office.

Diamonds appeared in the campaign of horror as Taylor was found to have furnished rebels in nearby Sierra Leone with arms and recruits in exchange for illegally-mined diamonds. This made him guilty of “aiding and abetting” the guerrillas, making him “criminally responsible” for atrocities in Sierra Leone, ruled the judge. However he was acquitted of being personally or mutually responsible for the offences.

Important to the case was proof that Taylor’s employees gave glam model Naomi Campbell a pouch of gemstones as a present after they met at the star studded gala banquet hosted by Nelson Mandela, then South Africa’s President, in 1997. Appearing as a witness in August 2010, Miss Campbell asserted that she’d been given 3 “small, dirty-looking stones” by some unknown visitors whilst staying in a government chalet as a guest of the South African President.

She explained she did not know their value as she was used to viewing diamonds shiny and in a box. During the four year litigation, there was also the evidence heard from Mia Farrow, the Hollywood movie star and also Carole White, the model’s previous agent of 17 years.

In an additional case heard this month, a care home supervisor reinvented herself as Lady Glanister and decided to buy 15 fur coats, jewellery and champagne after thieving ?330,000 from her boss, a court heard. Jenny Glanister turned to wrongdoing after becoming addicted to a television jewellery shopping channel. She worked as a finance manager accountable for two care homes dealing with adults with learning problems.

In between 2004 and 2010 she stole an overall total of ?338,805 and used the name Lady Glanister on the shopping channel to treat herself with gemstones. She was locked up for 32 months on Tuesday right after she admitted to eight counts of larceny, fraud and false accounting at Northampton Crown Court.

The TV shopping channel advertised designer jewelry brands and cute jewellery, which seduced the care home chief into a life of crime.

Ignore TV shopping programmes, take a peek at some really cute jewellery products which are rather unlike the traditional items you see in the shops.